top of page

Examples of Red flags in BDSM.

What is a red flag in BDSM?


A red flag in BDSM could be any behaviour or situation that violates negotiated boundaries, disregards consent or poses a risk to the physical or emotional well-being of participants.


Red flags in BDSM
Red flags in BDSM


Exploring BDSM dynamics can be a thrilling and fulfilling journey for many individuals. However, amidst the excitement, it's crucial to remain vigilant for signs of potential toxicity or manipulation.


In this article, we'll delve into 25 red flags that can indicate fake or unhealthy BDSM dynamics, offering insights to help you navigate these waters safely.


Please remember the list contains examples but in reality the examples given are NOT role dependant and are interchangeable he/she/they and dom/switch/sub.


1. Addressing him as 'DomlyDomTitle' right off the bat? Nope.


Entering into a BDSM dynamic requires mutual respect and consent. If someone insists on being addressed by grandiose titles from the get-go, it could signal a lack of genuine connection or a desire for unwarranted power dynamics. Authentic BDSM relationships cultivate respect organically, rather than demanding it through titles.


2. Jumping to cam sessions for his pleasure early on? Nope.


While exploration of mutual desires is a natural part of BDSM, pressuring someone into immediate cam sessions solely for the dominant's gratification can indicate a disregard for the submissive's boundaries and comfort levels. True BDSM dynamics prioritise communication and consent, allowing both parties to explore their desires at a comfortable pace.


3. Claiming undying love after just 2 days? Nope.


Love and attachment develop over time through shared experiences and genuine connection. Declarations of love in the early stages of a BDSM dynamic may indicate manipulation or a desire to fast-track intimacy for ulterior motives. Healthy BDSM relationships value authenticity and allow emotions to evolve naturally.


4. Demanding obedience with a 'Hello slave, I am a Master' introduction? Nope.


Consent is paramount in BDSM dynamics, and true dominance is earned through mutual trust and respect, not demanded through forceful commands. Introductions laden with expectations of immediate obedience can signal a lack of understanding of BDSM principles or a disregard for the submissive's autonomy.


5. Sending generic messages claiming uniqueness? Nope.


Authentic connections in BDSM are built on genuine interest and understanding of each other's desires and boundaries. Mass-produced messages devoid of personalization or sincerity undermine the essence of BDSM, which thrives on mutual respect and individuality. Genuine dominants seek meaningful connections rather than generic interactions.


6. Suggesting a first meeting in a private or unfamiliar setting? Nope.


Safety is paramount in BDSM dynamics, and initial meetings should always occur in public spaces where both parties feel comfortable and secure. Proposing to meet in a secluded or unfamiliar location raises red flags about the dominant's intentions and commitment to ensuring the submissive's well-being.


7. Invalidating your submission if you don't comply immediately? Nope.


Submission is a gift given willingly, not a commodity to be demanded or revoked at will. True dominance respects the submissive's autonomy and acknowledges that obedience is negotiated and earned through trust and communication, rather than enforced through ultimatums or manipulation.


8. Insisting on a name change to assert ownership within 3 messages? Nope.


Names are deeply personal and should only be altered within a BDSM dynamic with mutual consent and understanding of the significance behind them. Pressuring a submissive to change their name early on signals a lack of respect for their identity and autonomy, undermining the foundation of a healthy BDSM relationship.


9. Imposing strict rules by the fourth message? Nope.


Establishing rules and boundaries is an essential aspect of BDSM dynamics, but they should be negotiated collaboratively and with consideration for each party's needs and limits. Imposing rigid rules early on without open communication and consent can lead to resentment and conflict, detracting from the mutual trust and understanding that underpin healthy BDSM relationships.


10. Justifying consent violations with dominance? Nope.


Consent is non-negotiable in BDSM dynamics and should always be obtained and respected without exception. Using dominance as a justification for disregarding consent undermines the fundamental principles of BDSM and can lead to emotional or physical harm. True dominants prioritise the well-being and autonomy of their submissives, recognizing that consent is the cornerstone of trust and intimacy.


11. Expecting instant and total submission? Nope.


Submission is a journey of exploration and growth that evolves over time through trust and